I set a nice trap there for you to fall into.
I soloed the game in Hardcore, made many, many trips WsK/Baal with my Oriana, a fire rogue, who was dressed with 'Edge', Twitchthroe and Stealskull.
With untwinked items, I'm confident that Thorns out-damages the Might setup. It might even beat it in a twinked setup, to a point, but I'm not interested in acquiring all of that stuff just to prove that at some point an Enigma wearing Necro with a Might/Infinity mercenary outstrips my 'TirTalAmn' bow.
I wrote about this more in depth on the Amazon Basin forums in a thread with the title: Giving your summoner an 'Edge'. You can read a little more about my thoughts there, or simply make the bow and give it a test drive yourself.
What damages, indeed.That is the weird part.. what damages? Because it is Mercenary that does damage, but edge takes damage away in the first place. Remember, skels do significantly less damage than a solid act 2 mercenary.
It's nice to read about your experiences with the Act1 Rogue, and I have no doubt you could solo thru HC with her... after all I've even heard about people basically playing naked.
But I don't see the value in you mentioning how you think Thorns will outdamage Might - because in the setup I mentioned you would have BOTH Might Act2 merc AND Thorns on swap. How could your setup with just Thorns beat out having both your cake and eating it too?
I am not even trying to speak to whether Thorns would be better than Might... although just from a quick estimation I would highly doubt that to be the case. I am just saying that it can be nice to have Thorns on weapon swap for those times in Norm and NM that your army gets swarmed by Fast hard-hitting physical dmg mobs. You can just let them quickly kill themselves on your Thorns aura, and all it takes is a simple weapon swap.
Rest of the time, it's a completely standard Summoner setup with Maxed Skellies/Amp Dmg/Act2 Might merc. Thorns isn't there as a sacrifice in place of some other benefit, it's there on swap as an additional tool when needed.
If you are here to come out and unequivocally say (which you haven't really done yet) that Thorns still deals insane dmg even in Hell mode... I think either you are mis-remembering or might have been on some substances while playing?? Sure you could slug thru it if you chose to, but most people realize how bad it slows down and change to something better.
I don't really know how to prove that it does massive damage.
My intuition tells me that just the Edge bow should be a lot weaker than Might for a well-geared Fishy. Bramble stacks right? My intuition still tells me that an ACT 1 rogue with Edge+Bramble < than a well-geared Act 2 merc. But my intuition could be very, very wrong. Haven't done the math.
Lvl 15 Thorns seems useless in Hell. But assuming Bramble stacks you could get a Lvl 36 Thorns. You would have to give up _everything_ about your Act 2 merc though, and that is a lot if you assume good gear on him. You can't just compare to the Might aura- you must also factor in the fact that you now lack the Act 2 Merc, who can be pretty good. Anyway since you are the one proposing this I nominate you to do the math. No fair just looking at hard-hitters like Lister.
And Knarl: Your point is well-taken. Might be interesting in NM as a switch but... lots of other useful switches at that point. I can't say my Fishy had any problems at all in NM other than getting bottle-necked in the Maggot Lair and Arcane. I'd rather have tele charges on switch for that reason.
Because it's ridiculously easy to get?Well, now you are bringing up another sore subject for me.
I make post after post railing against how many regulars here make guides, or give advice to newer players, and every time it is always "Infinity this, Enigma that, Fort and Grief, eBotDz eDoom this and that yada yada". And from the tone of most of them, they seem to think you should have Enigma within the first 3-5 days of a new ladder.
So on your point about including fairly sweet low gear options like Edge in build guides, I agree with you wholeheartedly. What am I suppose to think when I read their recommendations, when I may have joined here in 2008 but I've played D2 itself since 1.08/1.09, and I have NEVER owned any of those runewords or top items? They make it sound like easy classes like Fishymancer can't be played without Enigma >.>
I thought this was just a game, something relaxing to do for maybe an hour after a hard days work. If most of them are running 24/7 bots across multiple accounts, trading with forum gold in that place I won't even bother to name, and getting online for minimum 6-10 hours every single day, then maybe they have a different experience than other players do. But why do they turn around and assume every regular player on Bnet has 100+HRs of wealth within days of a new ladder, and then state gear like Infinity/Enigma is pretty much required? /boggles the mind.
News Flash: Playing this decade old game with a simple class like Summoner Necro does not require Enigma... or even special gear. I am sure it can be done naked, and most likely already has been done. Stick your forum gold where it belongs, where the sun don't shine.
I don't believe that's not true at allBecause it's ridiculously easy to get?..
how many is a "a few"A few big runs later I will normally have a good GC skiller
I'll work a bit more on my calc. I'd like to get something that'll output tons of variations based on monster damage, monster level and all those other things. Or I might just go play D2 and have fun...
However, if I'm wrong about that, then I'd suggest that you have rotten luck.
I don't see why this is so hard to understand. The real point of contention between our point of views is this: I firmly believe that a higher percentage of D2 players than you would ever imagine, DON'T read forums like these... ever. Don't read guides, don't play 10+hours per day, and sometimes don't ever play in public games. Not to mention don't play Bnet online.
And most people in these forums, who assume that everyone playing D2 automatically read the forums as well, also believe everyone plays exactly the way they do. Which means they believe everyone logs as much playtime, and views this game as more of a chore and gives two shizes about accumulating 100's of HRs worth of wealth.
I've never once stated that it is impossible to accumulate the wealth needed to trade for those high runes. All I have ever stated is that your guide and almost all others I've read, assume that every D2 player will eventually gain that wealth. In actual fact it could be a very low percentage of players like maybe 20% that care enough to play/gather that much, yet your guides pretty much state the end goal has to be crud like Enigma.
I don't understand how many times I have to state one simple truth. Enigma is not required in ANY way to play a Summoner, I've played every ladder and even with my limited gameplay I've Patriarch'd and easily run thru Hell mode for drops, and not only never found more than one (recently) good rune but I've never accumulated the wealth to build those top r/w's. The one thing you will never seem to admit, is that there are more players like me... you just refuse to believe it. Yet if it is true and I turn out to be right, then your guide leaves out/makes feel inadequate a massive portion of the playerbase.
And your one line in the guide mentioning as a start "Viper, Arm of Leoric, Homonc, etc" doesn't count. That is not starter gear for first couple days of new ladder... for many players, that will probably be the endgame gear they end up in. Whether you think they should have freetime in their lives to play 10hours a day or not. Some of us play games exactly as they are meant to be played, as a hobby a couple hours total per week. Really... these points are simple, and shouldn't be this hard to understand.