- Jul 13, 2007
- 2,044
- 43
- 28
The main issue I have with democracy is that it can not weight human emotions. If a person knows something about a particular subject matter or another we tend to develop emotions that connect us to these issues. This naturally leads us to the idea that by gathering a larger sample will somehow give us a more corrected view of the situation at hand of which there is no proof to substantiate this view. My point is that there is no proof's in this world that gathering larger samples will actually give us a more or less clearer view of what is the best course of action for humanity to take.
My father was a well known "commy" or socialist here where I live and I can't say I have ever agreed wholeheartedly with his views. However communism does not get given a chance in our society today. At every opportunity it is shot down in flames by the 'politically correct' social elite and their connective powers. So how is the modern human in a capitalist society meant to grapel with the challenges of the post covid-19 world?
The world right now is in a state of flux that we have never seen before from a capitalists view so where are we headed?
My father was a well known "commy" or socialist here where I live and I can't say I have ever agreed wholeheartedly with his views. However communism does not get given a chance in our society today. At every opportunity it is shot down in flames by the 'politically correct' social elite and their connective powers. So how is the modern human in a capitalist society meant to grapel with the challenges of the post covid-19 world?
The world right now is in a state of flux that we have never seen before from a capitalists view so where are we headed?