- Mar 13, 2019
- 1,188
- 1,308
- 93
@ffs That's a Zod from a non-Wraith monster even!
I don't know about separate leaderboards but taking into account lower runes seems only fair to the 1.07 runners. In fact since the scores are based on rarity the 1.07 qualifiers should go down all the way to those of score 3.4. After all people get their 3.4 points for a 1.13 pul but no points for a 1.07 Lum. (A 1.12 Lum is about as rare as a 1.13 Pul and I assume that 1.07 runes are even rarer than those in 1.12.)
Currently 1.07 runners only get scores above 19.4 points per rune or nothing at all. That's roughly the equivalent of 1.13 runners only counting runes Jah and above. (which would be ridiculous...)
@art_vandelay I didn't mean to not include 1.07 at all. Just maybe with a separate scoreboard for that version. The rarity and scores of 1.07 runes are so drastically different from 1.13+ runes that they distort the results quite a bit. I mean, look at WoRG's score this round. To beat that score in 1.13+, your top 5 would need to be at least 3 Zod and 2 Cham runes. Look at his score from the first round. Impossible to beat even with 5 Zods. Then there are other 1.07 runners who didn't score at all because they haven't found Pul+. Which makes me think that maybe 1.07 qualifiers should start with lower runes than Pul.
I don't know about separate leaderboards but taking into account lower runes seems only fair to the 1.07 runners. In fact since the scores are based on rarity the 1.07 qualifiers should go down all the way to those of score 3.4. After all people get their 3.4 points for a 1.13 pul but no points for a 1.07 Lum. (A 1.12 Lum is about as rare as a 1.13 Pul and I assume that 1.07 runes are even rarer than those in 1.12.)
Currently 1.07 runners only get scores above 19.4 points per rune or nothing at all. That's roughly the equivalent of 1.13 runners only counting runes Jah and above. (which would be ridiculous...)